Highend og elektronisk musik

The Canton Reference 3.2 DCs are world-class speakers that can handle anything you throw at them. These are some of the most enjoyable speakers I have ever listened to and I would put them up against anything at and even above their price point. The Reference 3.2 DCs are the kind of speakers you want to show off, because everyone will immediately get drawn into their warmth and depth. Canton isn't as well-known a brand in our country as it is in its homeland of Germany, but that is changing, and if they continue to produce speakers of this caliber, they will soon be one of the largest speaker makers in our country as well in as their own.

Her er et testuddrag fra Stereophile: 

A price of $16,000 for a pair of Canton Reference 3.2 DCs seems to me perfectly appropriate. This reference-quality loudspeaker is quite in line with the best of the competition at this exalted level. In fact, I would be hard-pressed to name a clear winner among the excellent quartet of B&W 802D, Revel Ultima Studio2, Pioneer S-1EX, and Canton Reference 3.2 DC. Of these, the tonal balance is tilted up a bit by the Pioneer and down by the Canton, and sounds fairly neutral through the B&W and Revel—but those judgments, based on hearing those speakers in my own room's acoustics are defined per my own taste. The bass performances of all four are similar, but the Pioneer's is more damped and sounds less extended, the B&W's is richer and fuller, and the Revel and Canton are more powerful and extended. Yet so near in quality are all four that, if you set them up in another's listening room, all of those minor differences would have to be reassessed.

The Canton Reference 3.2 DC deserves the highest accolades. Given its size and price, both of which are fairly generous, it has no significant faults. It is both wide-range and transparent, and sounds great at almost any volume level likely to be used in the home.

Jeg kan kun nikke genkendende til deres konklusioner. Neutralt er ikke kedeligt....desværre for dem som tror det.
Neutralt gengiver de det som indspilningen indeholder, med minus på den allerdybeste bas, som er afskåret via deres DC filter. Til gengæld er der REN bas med FULD dynamik. Til den sidste oktav har jeg andre metoder

Og de Audiovector er en fejlkonstruktion i mine øjne.
En højttaler der kun kan lyde godt med de 1 procent af alle indspilninger i verden er ikke til en dyt.....
Hvilken højttaler lyder forresten ikke godt med en perfekt indspilning??????
Så godt som alle, inkl. en fejlkonstruktion.
Eller henvis gerne til en test der beviser det modsatte af min påstand.
Og en mindre god indspilning lyder ALDRIG, ALDRIG sådan så ens ører begynder at bløde som næsten kun en Audiovector kan. (fejlkonstruktion).

Sikke noget vås. 

At kun 1% af alle indspilninger skulle være godt mixet må jo stå for din egen regning. 

Lang det mest seriøse musik er jo indspillet rigtig godt, det er den slags jeg hører, Trende Møller er et  et rigtig godt eksempel, men hvis du hovedsageligt høre plastic pop, så er du da helt sikkertbedre tjent med en farvet og tilgivende lyd.

Desuden er lyd jo subjektivt, og at kalde det en "fejlkonstruktion" er en meget firkantet udmeldning.